Comments on: Separated at birth?

By: Mike

Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:22:28 +0000

Gracias, Pjeaches!

]]>

By: Pj Perez

Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:21:56 +0000

Thanks for the clarification, Mike. Unfortunately, the way the CityLife’s website is laid out, it’s nearly impossible to tell how the stories fit together in context with the print edition — or current cover — and when that story was found, it was online before a print edition had been gleaned.

However, though there is not an intended synchronicity between the two papers, the “special” issues do tend to come out in the same general time period. The nightlife issues were only a month apart, and the same usually happens with the local music issues. Come on, I know — I was in both mastheads for a total of 7 years.

Thanks to the magic of the internet, though, I can make the correction lickety-split. Yeah!

]]>

By: Mike

Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:37:54 +0000

Ahem: CityLife’s local nightlife issue didn’t run the week in question. It actually published a few days before Labor Day weekend, as it usually does.

As such, CityLife ran its nightlife glossary as a random Fear and Lounging piece, to mix things up. It had no idea the Weekly was running its nightlife issue that same week, let alone its own nightlife glossary, too. For the record.

And I’ll accept any criticism … except the notion CityLife has any synchronicity with the Weekly. Coincidence, apparently.

]]>